Skip to content

Cybersecurity · Security Testing

Proof of exploitable risk, and proof you fixed it

The request rarely arrives on your schedule. A customer's security review wants your latest pentest report, the SOC 2 window opens, or the board reads about a peer's breach and asks how you know. Penetration Testing as a Service keeps the answer ready: senior testers on recurring cycles, every finding demonstrated, every fix verified on retest, and a report dated this quarter.

Independent quality engineering & cybersecurity since 2020, with 100+ security & quality engineers, delivering on platforms we build and run ourselves.

IBM puts the average cost of a US data breach at $10.22M (2025), but the figure that stalls most companies first is smaller: the date on their last pentest report. Breaches grow in code that shipped after that report was filed, and enterprise security reviews have learned to ask about exactly that gap.

See a redacted sample report

The structure, depth, and remediation detail your team will receive, with client identity and evidence removed. No form, no email: the download is open.

Download sample report (PDF)

A year in the program

What a standing engagement looks like over time

A one-time pentest is a snapshot. A program is a moving picture. Here is how a typical year runs, and why the evidence never goes stale.

  1. Kickoff

    Scope directly with your testers

    Targets, rules of engagement, and the evidence you need out are agreed with the senior engineers who will do the work. Access and comms channels are set up securely.

  2. Each cycle

    Assess, report, retest

    Manual, OWASP/PTES/NIST SP 800-115-aligned testing of the in-scope surface. Critical findings are raised the day they're found; the cycle ends with a retest-verified report.

  3. Between cycles

    New scope on demand

    Ship a new application or API? It's added to the program and assessed without a new procurement round. Coverage keeps pace with your release cadence.

  4. Ongoing

    Evidence that stays current

    Each cycle refreshes the evidence auditors and customers ask for, so a security questionnaire is answered from a current report, never a year-old PDF.

What a testing cycle delivers

Manual testing across your real attack surface

Web, API, mobile, thick client, network, and cloud, tested by hand by senior engineers. Tools give us breadth; the humans find the authorization and logic flaws attackers actually use, the ones your customers' security teams ask about.

Exploit-verified findings

Every finding in the report has been demonstrated, with reproduction steps and evidence of impact. When your engineers open it, nothing is theoretical and nothing is scanner padding, so remediation starts the same day.

Retest included

After your team fixes, we verify and update the report to 'remediated and retested', the phrase auditors look for. The engagement closes with proof, and the proof is what you forward.

Compliance-focused scoping

Scope is shaped to the evidence your auditor will request under GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, or ISO 27001. You test once and answer several frameworks with the same artifact.

How it’s delivered

  1. 01

    Scope

    You meet the testers on the first call; there is no sales layer to translate through. Targets, rules of engagement, and the evidence you need out are agreed in writing.

  2. 02

    Test

    Manual assessment aligned to OWASP, PTES, and NIST SP 800-115. Critical findings reach you the day they are demonstrated; nobody waits for the report to learn bad news.

  3. 03

    Report

    Findings ranked by exploitability and impact, each with reproduction steps and remediation guidance your engineers can act on without a follow-up meeting.

  4. 04

    Retest

    Fixes verified, report updated, evidence refreshed. The cycle then repeats on your release cadence, so next quarter's questionnaire meets this quarter's report.

Tools & standards

Tooling
Burp Suite Pro, OWASP ZAP, Nmap, Nessus, Nuclei, SecurityTrails
Methodology
OWASP Testing Guide, PTES, NIST SP 800-115; retest policy standard
Team
63% of engineers certified: CISSP, CEH, eCPPT, ISTQB, AWS

What you receive

  • An executive summary your board can read without a translator
  • Technical findings with reproduction steps and evidence, ready for your engineers' backlog
  • Remediation guidance ranked by real exploitability rather than CVSS arithmetic
  • A retest-verified final report you can hand to auditors and enterprise customers as it stands

Evidence

Found, fixed, and proven fixed

In one web vulnerability assessment and penetration test (VAPT) we demonstrated a full authentication bypass through unsigned JWTs, alongside a public S3 bucket and RBAC gaps. Each finding was reported with reproduction steps, remediated by the client, and verified fixed on retest. The final report says so.

Customer success

Three years, one client

“I have consistently witnessed their deep understanding of cybersecurity, timely delivery, and effective methodologies over three years of working together.” (Rajasekhara Saidam, Information Security Officer, HackerEarth)

Engagement

Ways to engage the same senior bench

Buy it as a scoped project, embed it in your team, or run it as a managed service. The engineers and the governance stay the same, whichever shape fits.

Point-in-time assessment

A scoped, one-time pentest with a full report and one retest: for a release gate, a customer requirement, or the annual baseline your framework expects.

Standing program (PTaaS)

Recurring cycles aligned to your release cadence, with a retest closing each one. Auditors get current evidence at every surveillance visit, and your team stops re-explaining the environment to a new tester every year.

On-demand scope additions

Add an application, API, or environment to the running program without re-contracting. Scoping starts in days, because the team already knows your estate.

Who this is for

  • CISOs replacing the annual point-in-time pentest with a standing program that keeps evidence current
  • CTOs and VPs of Engineering facing a SOC 2 or ISO 27001 deadline who need credible testing evidence by a fixed date
  • Product and sales teams whose enterprise deals wait on security questionnaires demanding a recent pentest report

Proven here

Teams we've delivered this for

  • A finance & banking company
  • A developer-assessment platform
  • A banking-sector software provider
  • A crypto trading & exchange platform
  • An e-learning platform
  • A cybersecurity partner
  • An IT services & product company
  • A home-healthcare provider
  • A SaaS platform
  • A technology product company
  • A technology company
  • A technology services firm
  • A digital services firm
  • A technology consultancy
  • An enterprise IT environment

Engagements shown by industry; client identities are kept confidential.

Common questions

What do we receive at the end?

An executive summary written for a board, technical findings with reproduction steps and evidence, remediation guidance ranked by exploitability, and, after fixes, a retest-verified final report you can pass to auditors and customers as it stands.

Can we see a sample report before engaging?

Yes, and we'd rather you did. A redacted sample report is available to download on this page, so your team can judge our reporting depth, severity model, and remediation detail before anyone books a call.

Is retesting included?

Remediation of reported findings is verified and the report updated to 'remediated and retested', the wording auditors expect. Retest scope and window are set in the engagement agreement.

Who actually does the work?

Senior engineers from our own bench: 63% hold industry certifications (CISSP, CEH, eCPPT, ISTQB, AWS). The people who scope your engagement are the people who run it; there is no rotating offshore bench behind the proposal.

Which methodologies do you follow?

Testing is aligned to the OWASP Testing Guide, PTES, and NIST SP 800-115. Reports map findings to the frameworks your auditors use (SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR) where relevant.

How are our data and the findings handled?

Engagements run under NDA, and engineers who handle client data undergo background checks. Findings and reports are shared through channels agreed at scoping and are not retained beyond the period needed to deliver and support the engagement. Data-handling specifics (storage, encryption, retention, and destruction) are documented in your service agreement; see the Trust page for our posture.

One practice, one loop

This is one stage of a single assurance loop: findings become regression tests, and their indicators become live detections, so a problem, once fixed, can’t quietly come back. A stack of separate vendors has no way to close that loop. See how the loop connects →

Have an audit date or a questionnaire waiting?

Bring the date and whatever scope you know so far. The testers size the engagement on the first call, and the retest that closes it is already part of the plan.