Threat modeling
Structured design review of new features before code exists: trust boundaries, abuse cases, and the controls that have to be present. The cheapest fix is the one made on a whiteboard.
Cybersecurity · Offensive Security
Stop paying for the same finding twice
The pentest report comes back and your team recognizes half of it: the same authorization gaps, the same injection classes, one release later. Product Security as a Service breaks that cycle by moving security into how you build, with threat models at design, security review at merge, and gates in the pipeline your tests already run in, so a finding class gets closed for good instead of rediscovered annually.
Independent quality engineering & cybersecurity since 2020, with 100+ security & quality engineers, delivering on platforms we build and run ourselves.
Every security defect that reaches production costs its fix plus a re-release, a disclosure decision, and sometimes a customer notification. Repeat findings cost more than that: auditors and enterprise security reviews read a recurring finding class as an SDLC problem, and they ask about it.
What we do
Secure-code validation
Review of your security-critical paths (authentication, authorization, crypto, input handling) by engineers who spend the rest of their week exploiting exactly these mistakes on offensive engagements.
DevSecOps integration
SAST, dependency, and secret scanning wired into your pipeline, with triage rules tuned until engineers trust the gate. A gate nobody trusts gets routed around; ours are built to be kept.
Security regression
Every fixed finding becomes a permanent check in the pipeline, so a bug class you have already paid to find once cannot quietly ship again.
How it’s delivered
01
Baseline
We read your SDLC, your pipeline, and your recent pentest reports, and find where the repeat findings get in.
02
Integrate
Pipeline gates and a threat-modeling cadence stood up with your leads, tuned to your release rhythm.
03
Operate
Design reviews, code validation, and triage run as features flow; findings arrive while the change is still open.
04
Measure
We track which finding classes stop appearing and tune the gates quarterly against that.
Tools & standards
- Pipeline
- Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps integrations
- Assessment
- Burp Suite Pro, OWASP ZAP, Nuclei; OWASP ASVS as the review baseline
What you receive
- Threat models for the features that carry your risk
- Security code-review findings with fixes proposed where the developer is already working
- Pipeline gates tuned until the signal is worth interrupting a merge for
- A security-regression suite that grows with every finding and never forgets one
Engagement
Ways to engage the same senior bench
Buy it as a scoped project, embed it in your team, or run it as a managed service. The engineers and the governance stay the same, whichever shape fits.
Embedded product security
Ongoing threat modeling, secure-code review, and pipeline gates inside your SDLC, priced as a standing capability.
Assessment + integration
A baseline product-security assessment followed by DevSecOps pipeline integration your team then runs.
Who this is for
- VPs of Engineering whose annual pentest report reads like last year's
- One-person application-security teams that need engineering capacity behind the program
- Teams whose enterprise customers now ask how security works inside the SDLC
Common questions
Do you slow down our releases?
The opposite is the intent. Gates are tuned to keep signal high and noise low so engineers respect them, and findings arrive in the pull request while the code is still warm.
Which pipeline tools do you integrate with?
Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Azure DevOps, with SAST, dependency, and secret scanning wired in and triaged against the OWASP ASVS baseline.
Who actually does the work?
Senior engineers from our own bench: 63% hold industry certifications (CISSP, CEH, eCPPT, ISTQB, AWS). The people who scope your engagement are the people who run it; there is no rotating offshore bench behind the proposal.
One practice, one loop
This is one stage of a single assurance loop: findings become regression tests, and their indicators become live detections, so a problem, once fixed, can’t quietly come back. A stack of separate vendors has no way to close that loop. See how the loop connects →
Ready to retire your repeat findings?
Talk through your security program with engineers who work both sides of it. We start from your last pentest report and where the same classes keep getting back in.