Cybersecurity · Security Advisory
The audit window has a date, an enterprise deal is waiting on the report, and the auditor's first request will be some version of show us. We produce the security-testing evidence audits actually ask for, mapped to the controls of GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, and ISO 27001, in a format assessors accept the first time.
Independent quality engineering & cybersecurity since 2020, with 100+ security & quality engineers, delivering on platforms we build and run ourselves.
A stalled audit stalls the deals behind it, and evidence can't be backfilled: a year of missing testing stays missing. Rushed remediation against a deadline costs multiples of steady preparation, and assessors can tell which one they're reading.
What the auditor gets
Each framework asks in its own vocabulary, and the artifact below is the answer our testing produces for it, so the audit meeting starts from evidence on the table.
| Framework | What it asks of testing | Evidence we produce |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Security controls operate effectively over time | Recurring pentest + vulnerability-assessment reports, retest attestations, control-mapped findings |
| ISO 27001 | Risk-based controls, tested and reviewed | Assessment reports mapped to Annex A controls; remediation and retest evidence |
| PCI DSS | Segmentation and application security around cardholder data | Scoped penetration test of the CDE, segmentation validation, remediation verification |
| HIPAA | Safeguards protecting PHI across systems | Assessment of PHI-bearing web, API, and mobile surfaces with remediation guidance |
| GDPR | Appropriate technical measures for personal data | Security testing evidence of the technical measures protecting personal data |
Penetration tests, vulnerability assessments, and configuration reviews scoped to the framework you're facing. We test and report against GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 requirements, so one engagement can feed several frameworks' evidence.
Your current controls against the framework's requirements, sequenced into a remediation plan, so the auditor finds a program instead of a scramble.
Reports built for audit consumption: control mappings, retest attestations, and scope statements assessors can cite directly. When the deadline is tight, we have taken an API assessment from kickoff to a verified clean retest inside five weeks.
Recurring cycles keep evidence current across surveillance audits and renewals. One client's continuous program is in its third year of quarterly cycles, with findings trending down cycle over cycle.
01
Target framework, audit timeline, and required evidence identified.
02
Gap analysis against the framework's controls.
03
Security testing scoped to the framework's requirements.
04
Reporting your auditor can consume directly, plus retest attestation.
Engagement
Buy it as a scoped project, embed it in your team, or run it as a managed service. The engineers and the governance stay the same, whichever shape fits.
A gap assessment against your target framework, sequenced into a remediation plan while there is still time to act on it.
Framework-scoped testing that produces the exact artifacts your audit checklist names, formatted for the assessor.
Recurring testing cycles that keep evidence current across surveillance audits and renewals.
No, and that distinction matters. We are an independent testing partner, not a certification body. We produce the security-testing evidence your auditor or certification body requires; the audit itself is issued by them. We hold no organizational certifications and never imply otherwise.
GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, and ISO 27001, as client-side requirements we test and report against. Reports map findings to the specific controls each framework checks.
Remediation of reported findings is verified and the report updated to 'remediated and retested', the wording auditors expect. Retest scope and window are set in the engagement agreement.
Engagements run under NDA, and engineers who handle client data undergo background checks. Findings and reports are shared through channels agreed at scoping and are not retained beyond the period needed to deliver and support the engagement. Data-handling specifics (storage, encryption, retention, and destruction) are documented in your service agreement; see the Trust page for our posture.
This is one stage of a single assurance loop: findings become regression tests, and their indicators become live detections, so a problem, once fixed, can’t quietly come back. A stack of separate vendors has no way to close that loop. See how the loop connects →
Give us the framework and the deadline, and the testing plan gets worked backwards from both, with evidence formatted for your assessor to consume directly.